For updated version—see www.Aquater2050.com/2015/12/

Abstract

In a previous paper (ref 3, AP4.7), a self-consistent theory called Model 1 was developed to answer ten major connected questions in astrophysics. The most important of these questions are:

• How can dark matter be explained and described?
• How can dark energy be explained and described?
• Where do the extremely high-energy cosmic rays that occur beyond the GZK cutoff come from?

 

Model 1 appears to successfully answer these questions. The unique features of this model are:

• There are two spaces in the universe, particle space and quantum vacuum space. A potential barrier separates them. One space contains visible matter, and the other space contains dark matter.

• There is a cycling of mass-energy between these spaces through the black holes that connect them. Particles pass from our space through black holes where they are converted into super particles that operate with unified force. They then pass into the high-energy vacuum space where they become dark matter operating behind the potential barrier.

• Dark matter particles interact with each other and form a slowly building and moving bubble centered on a galaxy. The bubbles of dark matter are connect to each other by corridors of dark matter forming a cosmic web, which guides the development of new galaxies.

• There, behind a potential barrier, the dark matter particles gain energy, build up in number and eventually exceed the ability of the barrier to contain them. They then explode back into particle space as a big bang. This process repeats to make an endless series of new universes.

• After the big bang exhausts itself, super particles continue to tunnel through the barrier into particle space. The super particles are unstable and break down into particles with extreme kinetic energy. In doing so, they give up potential energy into particle space. The potential energy gradually builds up to become the dark energy that we observe as the cause of our accelerating, expanding universe. The extreme energy protons are observed as cosmic rays with energy between the energy of force unification and the Planck energy, which is beyond the GZK cutoff.  

 

In this paper, the details of the interaction rate of dark with visible matter were explored. It was found that it might be possible to detect dark matter particles directly, and that an experiment to do so was under way. Preliminary results from the experiment agree with the calculations based on Model 1 shown here.

 

The Problem

Here, we explore the characteristics of super particles to see if they can be observed in particle space- i.e. are they too dark to observe? First, super particles covered by a potential shell do not show charges associated with the electromagnetic, weak, and strong forces. They are combined into one super charge and hidden behind the barrier potential. The super particle spin, if any, would not show beyond the barrier as well. They have only the super charge associated with the unified force. Thus they will not interact with the detectors we normally use. Particles in particle space will scatter off the potential barrier surrounding the super particle, however, so it is necessary to calculate this scattering cross section. This scattering cross section is like the scattering of a neutron off a proton, but with different energies. This n-p scattering cross-section has been calculated for high energy and low energy collisions. (Halliday, 47). With appropriate alterations for mass and energy, it has been possible to calculate the scattering cross section of a super particle off of a proton.

 

s = h2π/M  [ 1/(Vo + E)]

 

Where:

M = m_s m_p/ (m_{s +} m_p)

m_p = mass of particle space baryons = 1 GeV.

m_s = mass of super baryons = 10¹⁷ GeV.

V_o = potential of super baryons = 10¹⁹ GeV

E = kinetic energy of the particle space baryons = 1 GeV or less.

 

Then:   s = 10^-45 cm²  (Note-this is for S scattering.)

 

This calculation is for low energy scattering (S scattering), i.e. scattering of particles with kinetic energy that is low (particle space baryons) compared to the potential energy of the target particles (super particles). We don’t expect to have particles from particle space that have kinetic energy that is near to or above the potential energy of super particles. Not even the best accelerators can achieve kinetic energies between 10¹⁷ and 10¹⁹ GeV. Furthermore this is scattering off of the barrier shell, not the super particle itself.

 

It would be useful to obtain scattering data with higher energy particles in order to get data from the higher angular momentum components such as P-scattering, D-scattering, etc. This would allow us to obtain information on the internal structure of the barrier. This scattering experiment is not possible at the present time.

 

Clearly, a particle with this scattering cross section would be difficult to detect. So matter is dark or difficult to detect in particle space. Also, the collision cross section of the dark matter particles in visible matter is low enough that in colliding galaxies, the dark matter particles would pass right through visible matter, while the visible matter would interact with itself and coalesce, as observed by astronomers. This behavior has been observed.

 

It is desirable to detect this particle shell directly, however, in order to measure its parameters directly. In this paper, we will investigate the feasibility of detecting dark matter particles directly.

 

The Solution

First, we must define the concept of a cross section (see Halliday, 13). Consider a thin slab of material of thickness x and area A. We assume a collimated beam of single energy particles strikes A at rate R_o. The beam consists of dark matter (fixed) moving through the slab of material at the speed of the earth rotating with the sun around the galactic center. We will call the rate of interaction of these particles with the material in the slab R.

 

Option 1.

We could try a bubble chamber with liquid nitrogen as the detector. It can be tested with neutron collisions for efficacy. Nitrogen will be used for our calculations. The rate R is

            R = R_ons x

Where:

            n = number of baryons/unit volume in the slab.

               =  (14x6x10²³ baryons/14 gm of N) (0.8 gm/cc) (10⁷ cc) = 10³¹ baryons.

            s = cross-section (cm²) = rate at which the interaction occurs (events/sec).

                = 10^-45 cm²

            R_o =vNA

v = average velocity of our star around the galactic center~100 km/s (Peebles, 47)

N = density of dark matter = 5 x density of visible matter

                = 5 x 5 x10^-8 x (0.5)² = 6 x 10^-8 super particles/cc (Peebles, 123)

  

Now a reasonable experiment needs at least one event per year to be measurable with any degree of accuracy. So, we choose a detector, which is large enough:

            A = 10² cm x 10³ cm

            R_o = vNA = 10⁷ (cm/s) x 10^-7 (s part/cm^-3) x 10⁵(cm²) = 10⁵ (s part/s)

            x =  10³ cm

 

So, for a 1x10x10 m³ volume of liquid nitrogen, the rate R is:

            R = 10^-6  (events/s) = 10 (events/yr)

 

The detector is not perfect in turning an event into a recognizable detection rate, S. Assume an efficiency of E ~ 0.1. Then,

            S = 1 (detections/yr)

 

Thus we need a volume of liquid nitrogen ~ 10² (m³), to get a reasonable detection rate.

 

Option 2.

Now, perhaps a more efficient detector might be a crystal such as silicon or germanium (E ~ 0.7). A dark matter, visible matter collision will ring the crystal, and give an electronic signal. Very large, near perfect crystals will be required. Large crystals of Germanium are probably cheaper; so we will do the calculation with Germanium parameters.

                n = (72 baryons x 10²³ /72 gm of Ge) x (5.4 gm/cc) x (10⁷ cc) = 5.4 x 10³⁰ baryons

                s = 10^-45 cm² (see above)

            R_o = vNA = 10⁴ (part/s)

            A = 10² cm x 10² cm

            x = 10³ cm

 

So for a 1x1x10 m³ volume of germanium, the rate R is:

            R = 5 x 10^-8  (events/s) = 1.6 (events/yr)

 

For a Germanium detector of efficiency ~ 0.7, we get a detection rate of:

            S = 1.1 (detections/yr)

 

The above calculations only show that there appears to be a signal to find if we look for it. The signal will be faint, and mixed with a lot of noise and clutter. The details of equipment design and what one must do to suppress the noise and clutter and enhance the signal are beyond the scope of this paper and so are left to a later paper.

 

So, it appears to be feasible to detect a super particle with its barrier shell directly.

 

Summary and Conclusions

A model (Model 1) has been developed in AP4.7 (ref 3) that predicts dark matter, dark energy and extremely high-energy cosmic rays, which are observed between the energy of unification and the Planck energy, which is beyond the GZK cutoff, and describes where they come from.

 

In this paper, a calculation was pursued that estimates the rate of production and detection of interactions between dark matter and visible matter. This calculation is for S scattering. While working on this paper, it was found that an experiment was already underway using Germanium as the detector. The experiment is not complete, but initial results agree with the calculated rates. In fact, initial checks with all known existing data have been made, and Model 1 has been found to be in agreement with all these data. After the data from the current experiment are published, it would be useful to consider scattering from the higher angular momentum components such as P-scattering, D-scattering, etc.  

 

References

1. D. Halliday, Introductory Nuclear Physics, John Wiley and Sons, New York, 1955.
2. P. J. E. Peebles, Principles of Physical Cosmology, Princeton, New Jersey, Princeton University Press.
3. L. H. Wald, “AP4.7 DARK MATTER AND ENERGY-FUNDAMENTAL PROBLEMS IN ASTROPHYSICS” www.Aquater2050.com/2015/08/
4. L. H. Wald, “AP4.7A SUPER PARTICLE CHARACTERISTICS” www.Aquater2050.com/2015/08/
5. L. H. Wald, “AP4.7B SHAPING THE DARK MATTER CLOUD” www.Aquater2050.com/2015/08/
6. L. H. Wald, “AP4.7C DARK MATTER RATE EQUATIONS” www.Aquater2050.com/2015/08/